|
|
|
NOTES: There has been a talk of talk about the S&W Sigma line of pistols. Much of this talk comes from people who have not fired the Sigma or from people that are defending the Sigma like it is a puppy with AIDS. What I set out to do here was to do an unbiased (well, mostly) test of the pistol in crappy conditions. One of my friends let me borrow his Sigma 9mm for the test and here are the results: This Page is currently under Construction |
|
A local shop is having a sale on them,
the price is $250 and includes (4) standard capacity (16 round) magazines.
Because the price point is so attractive, I decided to do a test on this
platform. It has had approximately 400 rounds through it so no break-in issues should occur. I broke the gun down and I cleaned--but did not lubricate--the parts. I was surprised (although I shouldn't have) at what I found inside. The slide assembly is almost exactly the same as a Glock. This shouldn't be surprising since Glock sued S&W a few years back for patent infringement. Here's a quick breakdown of the gun:
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
While stripping the slide, a part of
the gun (all plastic pieces are white on the Sigma as opposed to the black
on the Glock) a piece of the striker assembly shot out across my basement
someplace. After more than a half hour of looking with no success, I
actually broke down one of my Glocks and the Glock part fit in perfectly. Of
course, as soon as I had the slide assembled we found the original parts and
I replaced them. So yeah--the Sigma has all S&W parts inside of it now. |
|
As you can see, the plungers are slightly different--perhaps not similar enough to be interchanged. |
|
Same with these parts |
|
Extractors are noticeably different--the Glock extractor is too wide to fit into the Sigma |
|
Yes, the Glock guide rod looks larger--this is because that is a G34 guide rod. When I used my G19 guide rod, it fit right into the Sigma. |
|
The striker spring on the Sigma is smaller and stiffer whereas the Glock spring is longer and less stiff. Actually, the Sigma spring is much harder to use than the Glock spring when installing the retainers (hence the problem we had installing them). I think these would be interchangeable though. |
|
The plunger springs appear to be the same |
![]() Striker pins are slightly different. Notice the spring on the Sigma spring to avoid an extruded firing pin. Frankly I find this to be a non-issue in Glocks. Perhaps a slight change to fight patent infringement? |
![]() The Sigma part is slightly longer |
![]() Slide comparison between my G34 slide and the Sigma |
The slides were so similar, we decided to do a test:![]() the slide did not lock into place, although it fit onto the frame. The Sigma frame is slightly longer. When we tried to put a Sigma slide on a Glock frame it didn't work because the Glock ejector is in a different location. |
|
The front sight appeared to be staked in place and
also glued with some kind of polymer. Looked a bit off
:
|
|
The Sigma also has some marks left over from plastic
injection molding that the Glock does not. This is most noticeable on the
trigger. I weighed the trigger in at a very spongey 11lbs(!) No excuse for a trigger that heavy IMHO. I also do not like the non-standard rail on the frame of the Sigma. |
|
So anyway, range time:
|
|
In action:
|
|
I found the magazines a tad difficult to load to a
full 16 rounds. This isn't unusual nor concerning with new(ish) magazines
like I was using. In order to avoid thumb fatigue I loaded only ten rounds
into each magazine. A maglula would have been of great relief today. I experienced my first failure at 120 rounds in. It was a mechanical failure, the slide did not lock back to the rear on the last shot. When I tried to open the slide it got stuck halfway and took a bit of effort to open and even more to keep it locked back
I marked the magazine so if it happened again I'd know if it was a magazine issue or not. |
|
Second failure was 240 round in. I had a
failure-to-feed
This was with a different magazine than the first. |
555 rounds there was another (I thought it would be
funny if it happened at 360 rounds). This time an FTE
![]()
|
|
I had to end the test at 700 rounds because I could no
longer fill the magazines. My girlfriend has a problem with most mags and
one of my friends crapped out on me last minute (thanks Aaron!). With a
maglula I'm confident I could have finished in one day.
As I said before, I don't like the trigger. No
surprise. I was getting pretty consistent hits at 25m with it though. I
attempted some double-taps but the trigger is obviously much heavier than I
am used to and they were slow and very inaccurate.
|
![]() (Thank God this wasn't an IDPA match or I'd have a lot of penalties!)
|
|
Operation for the last 150 rounds or so was very
sluggish. I think that if I could have continued the test I would've had
more FTE's. The aftermath: Upon returning home I disassembled the pistol but I did not wipe or clean anything off in case my friend wants to let me borrow his pistol for a little longer for another range trip. |
|
Muzzle: ![]() ![]()
|
|
SESSION II It was a beautiful day to finish off the last 300 rounds.
No issues for the first two hundred rounds. However, I did experience another failure-to-eject at round #928
As you can see from the pics, the next round nearly loaded. At round #950, I experienced another failure of the slide to lock back. It should be noted that this was a different magazine than the first failure at 120 rounds. Again at round #990, I experienced another failure-to-eject, just like the last.
|
| HOME |